Lee's Summit Tribune

Home
CATEGORIES
Welcome
News
Community
Health
Downtown Lee's Summit
R-7 School News
Free Parking
Contact Us
Obituaries
Opinion
Sports
Mavericks
Scouting News
VFW News
Lee's Summit Council Updates
Police Blotter
Election-Legals

Welcome to the new home of Lee's Summit Tribune. We are dedicated to providing you the most current and accurate news and events in Lee's Summit
Home » Opinion » Voter ID ensures one voice, one vote

Voter ID ensures one voice, one vote

Voter ID ensures one voice, one vote

Feb. 4, 2012

By Ramsey Fowler

America has evolved quite drastically from its original voting restrictions, which allowed only white males to vote. In 1870, the 15th amendment allowed former slaves to cast a ballot. In 1920, women were allowed to participate, and in 1924, Native Americans were added to the list. The most recent changes occurred in 1970, when the voting age was decreased from 21 to 18.

It’s quite evident that having the right to vote is a privilege worth fighting for. The election process is the foundation of what democracy in America was based upon.

Voter identification requirements continue to be a controversial topic. Legislation regarding this matter is currently pending in 26 states. This includes 13 states (Missouri is one of them) that have proposed to strengthen existing identification requirements. Sadly, 16 states do not require a photo id and will accept utility bills, bank statements or gun permits instead. This is incomprehensible to me. A photo ID is required to open a bank account, legally obtain a gun permit, attend high school events, shop at Sam’s Club or even rent a movie at Blockbuster! Why not be proud to confirm your identification when casting your vote? Unless, of course, you are not who you claim to be or don’t have the initiative to go about securing a valid ID.

Voter fraud does happen and should be seen as a serious threat to all. Last week, South Carolina’s Attorney General, Alan Wilson, informed the United State’s Justice Department that 953 ballots had been cast by deceased people in the recent Palmetto State elections. Just last month, Romney was declared the winner in Iowa by 8 votes, only to find out later that Santorum really won the caucus by 34 votes. In 2000, former president George W. Bush secured the presidency by 537 votes in a Florida recount. These are prime examples of how every vote really does count and can sway any election.

The Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law stated, “Every voter should demonstrate that they are who they say they are before voting. That form of proof should not include restrictive documentation requirements like overly burdensome photo IDs.” Overly burdensome? Give me a break! We all have worries in our lives, but I don’t think many of us are “overly burdened” by obtaining a drivers license, school ID or voter card! The Obama administration has come out against requiring a photo ID, and the Congressional Black Caucus declared it will “disenfranchise” many African American voters. You can’t board an airplane without a state issued ID. Is that also disenfranchising African Americans? I don’t think so. It’s insulting to assume that any American citizen, African
American or Caucasian, can’t figure out how to obtain a state issued ID card of some sort. All you have to do is bring proper documentation to the DMV and smile. If a citizen is unwilling to do this, then I can’t imagine how they could assume the responsibility of locating their assigned precinct and voting on controversial policies.

Recently I went with my friends to the movies. We were all asked to show our licenses to prove we were 17. None of us felt “overly burdened” or “disenfranchised” at this request.
Showing proper ID is not restrictive, but admirable and an honest gesture. It’s been implemented for centuries for the sole purpose of proving who we are. What’s the problem?

The election process is sacred. Its integrity must be upheld for proof of fair and just elections. We show our licenses every day for stupid things. The least Americans can do for the love of our great country is to support identification voting laws. This will ensure voter identity and truly secure one voice one vote.

God Bless America!

Ramsey Fowler is a senior at Lee’s Summit West High School.
Write to him at government@lstribune.net.




Bookmark and Share

Comments

  1. Paul Zainea says:
    February 16th, 2012 at 04:53
    Mr. Fowler, you make some very good points in your opinion piece. The right to vote – one that I acquired by becoming a Citizen of the United States – is something I value highly. The most important point you bring up is the one that argues against the “I’m only one vote” sentiment that so many American’s voice as elections approach.
    In Iowa 34 votes made a difference this year. In 2000 it was 537 votes – of all the votes cast that year. One vote matter a great deal. It is the importance of that vote that must also carry with it the responsibility to learn about the candidates and make a sound decision before you enter the voting booth.
    The area where I still understand both sides of the argument is the photo ID requirement. You and I and most – but not all – people in Lee’s Summit have no problem providing a photo ID. The United States has come a long way since 1865 as you point out. However, those who lived through the 1960’s (me as a distant observer in Argentina at the time) remember how many roadblocks there used to be to voting.
    As the pendulum swings from one side to the other, from unreasonable through reasonable all the way to unreasonable on the other end, we must remember that there was a time when voting took more than desire; it took courage.
    Yes, the political and political correctness winds have blown the pendulum too far the other way. A photo ID is not the issue – when truly viewed from the historical perspective – but the potential misuse of the requirement is the issue.
    It used to be, in these United States, that we would rather release a guilty man than put an innocent man in jail. Our entire jurisprudence was based on that particular principle: It no longer necessarily is that way now.
    Are we willing to turn away one rightful voter from the polls, simply to ensure that no one without the right to vote casts a ballot?

    Paul Zainea
    Lee’s Summit Missouri

Leave a reply

*Your name:
*Your email: (email won't be published)
Your website: (optional)
*Comment:
*CAPTCHA: CAPTCHA

Other Recent Articles from the Opinion Category:

SEARCH

PAST WEEK'S TOP 5
Page Views: 1,492
Lee's Summit Economic Development Council Board of Directors Endorse Airport Expansion
Page Views: 520
Lee's Summit R-7 Board of Education approves no-tax-increase bond issue for April 6 ballot
Page Views: 505
Wes Orth named December Optimist Students of the Month
Page Views: 390
Bedroom Fire Damages Lee's Summit Home At 12:34 p.m
Page Views: 328
Sex Offender Pleads Guilty To Child Porn, Faces At Least 15 Years In Prison
CITY LINKS
City of Lee's Summit
LS R7
LS Economic Dev Council
LS Tourism
LS Chamber
LS Parks & Rec

SCHOOL LINKS
LSCCS
RANDOM PICK
The Power Of Prayer In Lee’s Summit #PrayforQ
The Power Of Prayer In Lee’s Summit #PrayforQ
Home  | 
Copyright © 2009 Lee's Summit Tribune
Developed by Gaxio